Crash professionals test driving assistants: Germany builds the most autonomous cars – news

Almost every current car comes with a series of electronic assistance systems, from the entry into the upper class. But: Not all assistance systems work equally well. The Euro NCAP crash test experts have now checked seven vehicles and found large differences. You can see the test winner here in the video.

Euro NCAP has published a new ranking of seven vehicles that are equipped with driver assistance systems. Assistance systems help the driver to keep constant speeds and a secure distance from the vehicle in advance and to stay in their own lane. However, the systems should only support the driver, do not take control of the vehicle. The driver is expected to keep his hands on the steering wheel and his eyes on the street at any time. For this reason, Euro NCAP not only tested the ability of the vehicles to support and make driving more secure, but also evaluates how the system incorporates the driver and what safety support the vehicle offers when something unexpectedly happens.

The technologies that were initially offered vehicles of the upper class are now available in all categories, albeit to different levels and to different price ranges. As early as 2018 and 2020, Euro NCAP found that some vehicles promise more than they can hold: naming and interaction with the driver convey the feeling that the systems offer more automation than they can actually do.

In the most recent assistance system test, however, all tested vehicles were at least a balanced relationship between assistance competence-the extent to which the system can support the driver-and offer the driver’s commitment, i.e. the extent to which the driver has the feeling that control has the control To keep and not to decouple from the driving task, explains Euro NCAP in a press release.

Best cut in the test of the BMW IX3, which with "very good" was evaluated. Two other vehicles-the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Cupra Formentor-reach the grade "Good". A little surprise: the assistance systems of the Polestar 2 and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 are only "moderate" classified during the Toyota Yaris and the Opel Mokka-E systems "Entry level" Offer.

Finally, the ranking of vehicles with the best assistance systems looks like this:

  1. "Very well" – BMW IX3

    Support from the vehicle: 83.3 %
    Driver integration: 83.8 %

    The IX3 convinced with a high degree of support and an equally high level of driver integration. BMW combines card-based information on speed limitation with real-time camera information. The cruise control system adapts its speed to upcoming street characteristics such as curves and intersections. The IX3 reacts in most test scenarios to avoid collision and only requires emergency brake interventions in the more critical scenarios with standing vehicles. The status information of the assistance systems are clear, and the head-up display also shows the system status in the direct field of vision of the driver. The advertising material and the IX3 manual also correctly indicate the limits of the system functions.

  2. "Good" -Ford Mustang Mach-E

    Support from the vehicle: 71.8 %
    Driver integration: 69.1 %

    The Mach-E also showed a nice relationship between reliable support and active driver integration in the test. The status information of the assistance systems are clear, but there is no head-up display. Ford’s name for the system, "Co-Pilot 360", however, could imply more functionalities than are actually present. So the cruise control of the Mach-e cannot adapt its speed to upcoming curves and intersections.
    For testing from Mustang Mach-E at Site

  3. "Good" – Cupra formentor

    Support from the vehicle:
    79 %
    Driving integration: 70.3 %

    There is also no head-up display for the formentor, which also clearly spends its status information clearly and clearly. In addition, Cupra has not equipped the design gate with an internal camera, so that the system only relies on the steering wheel input when monitor monitoring is only. Overall, however, the assistance systems contained are quite reliable at not too high speeds.
    To test from the Cupra Formentor at Site

  4. "Moderate" – Polestar 2

    Support from the vehicle:
    50.3 %
    Driving integration: 70 %

    The Polestar 2 avoids test scenarios with adaptive cruise control a collision with moving vehicles, but does not react to vehicles that have been stopped. The interventions of the automatic brake system offer only limited additional support in critical situations. In the event of a not reacting driver, the polestar will at least lead a controlled stop in the lane. If the radar or the camera are blocked, the car warns in time and prevents the system from activating. Overall, the Polestar 2 offers a moderate level of vehicle assistance with a good level of driver integration. The result is a moderate but balanced system.
    For the test from Polestar 2 at Site

  5. "Moderate" – Ioniq 5

    Support from the vehicle: 77.4 %
    Driver integration: 80 %

    The adaptive cruise control in Ioniq 5 can adapt its speed for upcoming curves, but not for other elements such as intersections or roundabouts. In addition, the Stromer does not have an Active Blindspot System that is supposed to prevent the lane change into neighboring vehicles. However, a lane change assistance function is available. In the event of a not reacting driver, the IONIQ 5 deactivates the system and thus no longer guarantees any support, which has led to significant punt cables.
    For testing from Hyundai Ioniq 5 at Site

  6. "Entry level" – Toyota Yaris

    Support from the vehicle: 56 %
    Driver integration: 79.3 %

    The cruise control of the Yaris cannot do its speed to upcoming street characteristics such as
    Adjust curves and intersections. In the test scenarios with adaptive cruise control, it avoids collisions with moving vehicles, but only reacts to the stops stopped at the lower test speeds. The Toyota Yaris offers the essential assistance functions and is supported by a good driver integration, but does not guarantee any support from a non -reacting driver. The Japanese also lacks the sophistication of more advanced systems, which leads to a classification in the beginnings.

  7. "Entry level" -Opel Mokka-e

    Support from the vehicle:
    57.5 %
    Driver integration: 67.9 %

    Mokka-e only uses camera information and no card information to recognize festivals, variable and temporary speed limit signs. The system can adapt the speed to upcoming street characteristics such as curves and intersections. Just like the Yaris, the Mokka-E with its adaptive cruise control avoids a collision with moving vehicles, but only reacts to the vehicles that have been held at the lower test speeds. Here, too, due to the simplicity of the assistance systems, it is only enough to classify the entry level.
    For testing from the Opel Mokka-E at Site

The detailed reports of the individual vehicles as well as the complete rankings with the existing assistance systems can be found on the
the associated website of Euro


Michiel van Ratingen, General Secretary of Euro NCAP, says of the test: "The balance between support and commitment is crucial. Cars are not yet able to drive fully automated, and the drivers should not be tempted to assume that this is the case. Reports from America have shown which serious problems can arise if the expectations of the possibilities of such systems are unrealistically high and if the car in which the driver is sitting not actively tries to include it back into action. We are pleased that the manufacturers represented in this test round make it clear what support you can offer."

You might also be interested: are e-cars really dangerous in underground garages? Professionals make the fire sample

Cities prohibited electric cars in underground garages – and at some point gripped grinding the ban again. Are burning electric cars more dangerous than burning petrol engines and diesel? On behalf of the Federal Office of Roads in Switzerland, a Swiss institute made a fire -fighting attempt with a clear result.

The experiment: are burning e-cars more dangerous than combustion engineers?

This article was written by Tobias Stahl
The original to this post "Crash professionals test driving assistants: Germany builds the most autonomous cars" comes from site.

Related articles

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Comment