The change to e-mobility is bought expensive and runs socially unfair. To this result comes a study by Deutsche Bank, from the “Heise.de “quoted. Accordingly, it costs the German state more than 20.000 Euro, when a Bev is used in the upper middle class instead of a car with internal combustion engine. Reason, in addition to the pure purchase bonus, further fiscal effects. In addition, better earners would benefit significantly more, it means.
The fiscal effects result from lower revenue from energy or mineral oil tax, motor vehicle tax, CO2 levy on gasoline and diesel and VAT, writes the bank under the title “Previous of e-mobility from the state expensive”. If e-cars are used as a company car, they will sink even more. For comparison, the Bank expendit from public budgets per pupil or student to be located in Germany in 2019 at 8200 euros.
As the largest fiscal difference between streamers and burners, Deutsche Bank determined the energy or. Electricity tax. Over twelve years, energy taxes would be incurred for fuel consumption, for example, a VW Golf Life in the amount of EUR 6500. For the VW ID.3 pure lies the advent from electricity tax at 550 euros.
Overall, Deutsche Bank concludes that the contribution to climate protection is still small in Germany and will be bought expensive with electromobility. “The CO2 avoidance costs can exceed the threshold of 1000 euros per tonne,” says in the study. In emissions trading, you only have a good 50 euros per ton. The current promotion does not meet the criteria of economic efficiency and ecological effectiveness.
“Frequently, electric cars are second cars in a household and / or they are used as a company car. On the other hand, all taxpayers finance the support measures and the expansion of the charging infrastructure, according to their respective performance, “will be explained in the study. In the promotion of private charging station also plays a role as to whether a private parking space is available.
The drivers and drivers of burners also paid part of the money for the operation of the charging infrastructure for electric cars at each tank process. When subsidies are shut down in the future, there is a risk that low-income households are so pronounced that they can not afford any eligible electric car, writes the bank.
If an electric car is used as a company car, it only has to be taxed as a monetary advantage with 0.25 instead of 1 percent of the list price, as long as the gross list price below 60.000 Euro is. Also, employees who pay the electricity costs for charging themselves have a monthly lump sum up to 70 euros from their employer. In addition, KfW charging points are promoting private land with 900 euros. The federal government also offers over 5 billion euros for the expansion of public loading infrastructure.
However, the state cemented by technology-specific subsidies and the regulatory classification of electric cars as zero-emission vehicles on one-sided technology paths. The increased use of synthetic, CO2-poor fuels is a way to reduce the emissions of the great global fleet population means.
Related articles
-
E-mobility in the Czech Republic and Slovakia 2021 – the current state of affairs
In the Czech Republic , the year 2021 was rather mixed for the automotive markets. The Czech Automobile Industry Association reported only a very slight…
-
Deutsche Bank: Tesla Model Y Deliveries start in 1. Quarter 2020
In June, MUSK gave to understand that Model Y, who has prioritized after Model 3, should come in the fall of 2020, but he said that they actually have an…
-
E-mobility in Poland 2021 – State of affairs
According to Samar, the Institute for Automotive Market Research, there are 445 in Poland last year.000 new cars have been registered. While that’s up 4%…
-
Consideration: Time-variable electricity tariffs – contemporary solution for e-mobility
Electric car owners are the pioneers of an integrated energy transition. They ensure that emission-free cars are on the roads, ideally charged with green…
-
Audi: billions for expanding e-mobility
On the way to a fully electric future from 2033, Audi continues to take a trip. As is apparent from a message, the carmaker 2021 has doubled the number…
-
What car rental company SIXT plans for e-mobility
Not only end customers have to prepare more and more on changing electromobility and a more and more digitized world. Even companies such as car rental…
-
Study predicts faster growth of e-mobility in Germany
The electrification of road traffic is essential to protect the climate. A needs-based charging infrastructure must be available for this – but how great…
-
E-mobility in the Baltic States 2021 – the current state of affairs
In November 2021 there were 4.341 pure electric cars and 2.972 PHEV in Lithuania. This was announced by the Lithuanian Ministry of Transport and…
-
Green Bank in Gunskirchen funded 100 electric cars
Many motorists can now make an electric car with the idea of make friends. Finally, this usually fails on its own purse, because at the currently…
-
ECOMOBIL 2013: ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, E-Mobility, E-up! & Co. in Focus
The Ecomobil in Offenburg Provides as Industry Platform on 13. and 14. November Energy Infrastructure, Transportation and Urban Planning Concepts and…
Says Deutsche Bank …., which Massive state support must be preserved before a crash.
These were funds of taxpayers, but with which consideration?
Burning boarding board posts in the 3-ton class?
I’m broken. Deutsche Bank. You can hardly imagine a dubious bank. Even with billions of taxpayers saved and then the courage to get up via E vehicle promotion. The bare!!! Whether it comes to risky speculative transactions, weaponsals, financing of coalees, old power plants or other human and environmental business ideas, the Deutsche Bank is always high up in the ranking. Returns from your own door. There is enough garbage that you can clean up!!!
Deutsche Bank probably overlooks that the subsidies do not arrive at the buyer but 100% of the manufacturer of E-vehes subsidies are generally only for science and development, and not to promote even more gwinn of industry and banks
For Deutsche Bank, it would certainly be better if the state grants a DB loan for the E-CAs and accept interest rates for 10 years. Then the gentlemen would have something of it and then would be fine.
Of course you could easily continue to promote the diesel drive. Based on the smallest motorization for gasoline and diesel of a VW Gulf you get after the current state of the ton of CO2 reduction to the bargain price of 600 euros.
The disadvantage of course is that you can never be CO2 neutral. Therefore, synthetic fuels necessarily have to be. In comparison to the BEV you need three times as much energy. How to make these fuels competitive without massive subsidies, probably only the Deutsche Bank.
The correct way would actually have been to open these costs to the new car price of burners and to finance this steering levy. With the current system in Germany, every taxpayer pays for the transition to CO2 friendly vehicles, even someone who has no car possessed his life. In principle absurd.
True words are not beautiful and beautiful words are not true. You just have to live with that others come to other conclusions. In any case, this would have been much more effective for the subsidization of e-auto-purchases in the renewable energy sector or network expansion. As far as I have in mind, Commerzbank was saved from the state and not Deutsche Bank. The promotion of e-mobility I hold only above 80% electricity from renewable energies for useful. Underneath, the obligation to install a at least 3kW PV system should be made to the edition. Then the car is at least balanced a zero emission vehicle.
The study of Deutsche Bank already corresponds to reality. But such a change of this corrupt banker is contradictory and thus unbelievable. You probably want to improve your bad image.
Already forgotten that the flood has caused damage in billions a few weeks ago and we probably have to expect all the few years with similarly high damage alone through floods?
If we do not renew, then we can call the current e-auto funding in the future as “peanuts”.
The motive of this “study” could be that Deutsche Bank is still investments in the fossil sector and therefore has an interest in the preservation of the fossil economy?
Incidentally, something off topic: The abolition of asset tax costs the state a lot of money. So the DTBK would have to plead for your reintroduction? The logic of the “study” once. Oh no, that’s something gaaaaanz other. With logic and consequence you can not come now, where would we come there?
The study of Deutsche Bank is not completely wrong. But just of them, this statement is heard, where they have diligently shared the population. Like a thief showing fingers on other thieves to overlook him.
Advantageously, electric cars are mainly for low earners who live on the failure lines and no longer need to breathe diesel and nitrogen oxides.
Climate protection is expensive, climate change is still much more expensive. See Ahrtal etc.