Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums

Diesel judgment in the news ticker

According to the diesel judgment: SPD demands higher exchange premiums

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-news

According to the diesel judgment: SPD demands higher exchange premiums

Site/Wochit Diesel-hammer: A city could ban diesel ban in a few weeks

The Federal Administrative Court has decided: German municipalities are allowed to impose diesel driving bans independently. All reactions and developments in the news ticker from Site.

  • Groko plans for diesel retrofit-that means for drivers
  • So the companies prepare for driving bans
  • That’s what the decision of the Federal Administrative Court is about
  • Site reporter Melchior Poppe was on site in Leipzig.

Note: The Federal Administrative Court has not introduced any driving bans. The question was whether cities can order driving bans according to applicable law and thus even without a nationwide uniform regulation in order to comply with pollutant limit values. The judges came to this judgment. (File number BVerwG 7 C 26.16 and BVerwG 7 C 30.17)

Wendt: "Police controls for driving bans, forget it"

19.48 a.m.: According to the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court on Diesel driving bans, the German Police Union has warned that the police have no way of checking driving bans. It is firm, "that the capacities will never be enough", the federal chairwoman Rainer Wendt told the newspapers "Heilbronn voice" and "Mannheimer morning". "Police controls for driving bans, forget it."

Wendt said, "We have to focus on important things for which the staff is not sufficient". He referred to more than 20 million overtime hours last year: "More just doesn’t work."

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-demands
dpa/Oliver Berg The federal chairman of the German police union Rainer Wendt.

Driving bans in Hamburg already from April

16.30 p.m.: In Hamburg, drivers must already count on limited diesel driving bans from April. The Senate announced this on Tuesday. Environmental Senator Jens Kerstan (Greens) had already announced on Tuesday, after a judgment of the Federal Administrative Court, to want to implement the measures decided by the red-green Senate for two streets in the Altona-Nord district as planned as planned. "The diesel passage restrictions in Hamburg will probably be the first nationwide", explained Kerstan. "The signs can still be ordered today and set up within a few weeks."

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-judgment
Google Maps, fol The planned passage restriction in Stresemannstrasse in Hamburg.

According to the Air Reine content plan, almost 600 meters of the Max Brauer-Allee and an approximately 1.6 km long section of the Stresemannstrasse will be affected by the planned passage restrictions. The section on Max-Brauer-Allee is expected to be blocked for trucks and diesel cars from the end of April, which do not meet exhaust gas standard 6 or Euro VI, Stresemannstrasse only for trucks. These restrictions should apply until the increased nitrogen dioxide values remain below the EU limit without the measures without the measures average.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-diesel
Google Maps, fol The planned area of the passage restriction in Max-Brauer-Allee in Hamburg

Environmental aid boss Resch threatens: are now also going against gasoline and electric cars

Resch is pleased: judgment is a resounding slap in the face for the federal government

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-demands

Site After the diesel decision in Leipzig: Resch is pleased: judgment is a resounding slap in the face for the federal government

Federal government wants to turn away driving bans

15.3pm: The Federal Government wants to avert diesel driving bans in cities even according to the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court. It is "the very clear goal of avoiding driving bans. This is also feasible with the variety of measures we have proposed", the executive transport minister Christian Schmidt said in Berlin on Tuesday. Among other things, he referred to a launched program of one billion euros to promote municipal measures.Environment Minister Barabara Hendricks (SPD) said her goal remains that driving bans would never have to come into force if possible because the air should be cleaned in another way. There is now a period of time to do this with "courageous measures" must be used.The car manufacturers as "Creator of the problem" should not be released from responsibility, said Hendricks. Technical retrofits would also be used, "which bring so much that nitrogen oxide emissions drop significantly and you can continue to drive into the city centers". The pressure for this has now increased.

Consumer center demands: "Clean mobility must become a top priority"

3:09 p.m.: The consumer advice center calls on the state to oblige the manufacturers to finance retrofits. The Chancellor has to offer diesel owners, the consumer center announced on the short message service Twitter.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-news
Fol Consumer advice center calls for retrofits to manufacturer costs

Federal Minister does not expect far-reaching diesel driving bans after judgment

3:06 p.m.: According to the diesel judgment of the Federal Administrative Court, the Federal Government has tried to dampen the concerns of millions of car owners from impending driving bans. The Leipzig judge’s decision does not mean that diesel driving bans come into force overnight, said Federal Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks (SPD) on Tuesday in Berlin. "The court did not impose driving bans", made it clear. There are "many instruments", To reduce the pollution in the air.The incumbent Federal Transport Minister Christian Schmidt (CSU) pointed out that the judgment for the imposition of driving bans by the cities "very high value" Lay on the protection of proportionality. The hurdles for driving bans would therefore be very high.Like Hendricks, Schmidt, like Hendricks, now called for the imposition of driving bans to be preceded by other measures for air pollution control. Hendricks said that the verdict was "The pressure has now increased". She now announced rapid consultations with the municipalities about the further procedure.The Mayor of Stuttgart Fritz Kuhn (Greens), whose city is particularly stressed by high pollutant values in the air, welcomed the judgment. The court in Leipzig has one "very differentiated decision" met whose implementation is not easy. "There can be prohibitions, but these must take into account the proportionality", said Kuhn. The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court provides for a gradual introduction of driving bans in the event of imposition. In Stuttgart, driving bans for older diesel up to Euro 4 standard should initially be checked, for Euro 5 cars there should be driving bans from September 2019 at the earliest.

"Leaning driving bans": Dobrindt comments on the judgment

3:01 p.m.: The former Federal Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt continues to reject driving bans. He points out that the "Proportionality" must be guaranteed. The first measure must be low -emission to make vehicles that are on the road in the city centers: These include, for example, public transport, taxis and urban fleets. The cities can continue to count on help from the federal government.The blue badge is nothing more than a general driving ban. This is not necessary, the cities could already act, said Dobrindt.

Merkel announces talks with municipalities and countries

14.4 a.m.: Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) expects limited consequences only expect the Federal Administrative Court. "It’s about individual cities in which more has to be traded," she said in Berlin on Tuesday. “But it’s really not about the entire area and all car owners in Germany.“Merkel pointed out that many cities affected by too dirty air“ do not have so much exceeding the limit values". The topic of proportionality also plays a major role in the judgment: "This means that we may also be able to adhere to the necessary limit values very quickly.“The Chancellor emphasized that air pollution control plans would definitely have to be implemented – also with the help of the federal government. Among other things, it highlighted an ongoing billion dollar program to promote municipal measures. Cities with special problems should be looked at again separately.We have to check who has to check that after the judgment of the Leipzig judges, "said Merkel. This should also be discussed with municipalities and countries. The Chancellor commented in a press conference with Serbia President Aleksandar Vucic.

Ozdemir: Prohibition of driving bans goes on the cap of the CSU minister

2:02 p.m.: According to Green politician Cem Ozdemir, the driving ban from Leipzig is the result of a false traffic policy. "The fact that it could go so far is the cap of the responsible CSU ministry in the Ministry of Transport", said the chairman of the transport committee in the Bundestag on Tuesday of the German Press Agency.Ex-Minister Alexander Dobrindt has decisions "passed onto dishes" and "On a cuddly course with the car bosses" set. To do this, car owners and everyone who would have to inhale toxic nitrogen oxides.Ozdemir called on the federal government and the auto industry to comply with its responsibility for consumer protection and people in the affected cities. "A serious, effective and binding retrofit program of the manufacturers is finally needed, which also deserves its name", he demanded.In addition, in the implementation of the judgment "more confusing confusion". With a "blue badge" For relatively clean cars, the federal government can include the countries and cities "Effective and uniform instrument" hand over. "We will ask the responsible Federal Minister Christian Schmidt in the traffic committee tomorrow", Ozdemir announced.

Rome also wants to ban diesel

13.46 a.m.: The decision of the Federal Administrative Court of Leipzig is already provoking initial reactions in other European countries. Shortly after the decision, the mayor of Rome, Virginia Raggi ("5 position"), announced that diesel vehicles also be banished from the Italian capital by 2024 at the latest. The spell should initially apply to private vehicles, Raggi announced on her Facebook profile.

Judgment encounters split reactions

1:27 p.m.: The Leipzig judgment of the Federal Administrative Court has caused a sharp criticism of business associations and politicians from the Union and FDP. On Tuesday, they warned of unforeseeable burdens for the economy. Representatives of environmental associations, Left Party and the Greens, on the other hand, welcomed the decision of the Federal Administrative Court to fundamentally enable driving bans for diesel. They also rated the judgment as a slap in the face for the federal government.In the case of business associations, on the other hand, the judge triggered great concern. The President of the Central Association of German Crafts (ZDH), Hans Peter Wollseifer, called on the cities and municipalities to the extreme restraint in the imposition of driving bans.Wool -sized driving bans criticized as "Massive interventions in property rights, mobility and freedom of professional activity". For craft businesses, driving bans of an expropriation would come the same. "The car manufacturers are caused by the diesel problem, not we craftsmen", the handicraft president explained.The medium-sized mechanical engineering association VDMA referred to impending problems for craftsmen and service technicians, "which are dependent on the use of existing diesel small transporters for their profession". The Federal Association of Package and Express Logistics (Biek) warned that driving bans for diesel would "primary care" When it comes to parcel delivery in city centers "paralyze". The management consultancy Ernst & Young said that the losses for the more than ten million diesel owners went "In the billions".Union and FDP took up the concerns of the economy. FDP parliamentary group vice Michael Theurer spoke of one "cold expropriation through the back door". The consequences of the judgment could "For commuters, craftsmen, self -employed and thus medium -sized businesses in Germany to a nightmare" will. The CDU member of the Bundestag Kai Wegner demanded: "Driving bans in German city centers must be prevented by all means. The big cities must not be paralyzed."

Many Germans ready to switch to alternatives when bans on driving bans

1:20 p.m.: According to a survey, many Germans are ready to switch to alternative means of transport in the event of diesel driving bans. An alternative for 38 percent of consumers bus and train, as can be seen from the collection of YouGov published on Tuesday. 28 percent would prefer the bike, 19 percent an electric car.

Resch threatens: We are now also going against gasoline and electric cars

1:15 p.m.: The German Environmental Aid (DUH) welcomed the Federal Administrative Court’s judgment on diesel driving bans. Duh federal managing director Jurgen Resch spoke of one on Tuesday in Leipzig "Very big day for clean air in Germany". Now he announces great plans to Site.

Resch threatens: We are now also going against gasoline and electric cars

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-ticker

Site Resch threatens: We are now also going against gasoline and electric cars

Environmentalists welcome driving bits: "Blue badge" necessary

1:10 p.m.: Environmentalists have welcomed the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court that diesel driving bans in the struggle for better air in cities are fundamentally possible. "Each city can now enforce the right of its citizens in clean air itself", said Greenpeace spokesman Niklas Schinerl on Tuesday.However, the implementation of the judgment will soon show that only a nationwide uniform regulation with a "blue badge" can prevent a patch carpet of different rules. "The Federal Government has to prevent no one will soon know from knowing which diesel can still go to which city", he demanded.The President of the German Nature Conservation Ring, Kai Niebert, named the judgment of the Leipzig judges "Profit for the health of the citizens" and "historical". "The courts are now forcing the legislator to act", he said. It now needs a strong and cheap public transport, a "blue badge" For relatively clean cars and mandatory retrofits of diesel cars at the expense of the carmakers."The auto industry gambled away badly", said NABU federal manager Leif Miller. This increases the pressure on politics and manufacturers to reduce the pollution of air through road traffic. Cities in particular would now have to be made as soon as possible to pioneers of the traffic transition.

Problem only passed on to drivers: FDP criticizes judgment

12:55 p.m.: The FDP Hessen has sharply criticized the judgment on the short message service Twitter. The problem is only passed on to the drivers.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-higher
Fol The FDP Hessen criticizes the judgment

"Exceptions for construction industry necessary"

12:49 p.m.: The general manager of the Central Association of German Construction, Helmut Bramann, demands exceptions to the construction industry: "If the municipalities actually introduce driving bans in individual cities and inner cities, this is a disaster for people who are urgently looking for an apartment. Because all construction sites will then come to a standstill and the urgently needed apartments will not be built into the end, since all construction machines, construction equipment and vans are operated with diesel. Therefore, uniform exceptional permits nationwide are necessary for all vehicles in the construction industry."

Lauterbach: Manufacturers are now duty

12:44 p.m.: Karl Lauterbach, the SPD health expert, commented on Twitter on the judgment: "The manufacturers are now duty. Without conversion, limit values can hardly be reached without driving ban. Customer protection!"

"Sound slapes for politics"

12:40 p.m.: Jurgen Resch has the judgment after announcement as "Sound slapes for politics" designated.

In Stuttgart: No driving bans in front of 1. September, exceptions planned

12:27 p.m.: The judgment provides for transition periods and a phase introduction of driving bans. In Stuttgart, driving bans are not before 1. September 2018 possible. In addition, there should be exemptions for craftsmen. However, there is no financial compensation obligation. "Certain losses of value are to be accepted", said the presiding judge Andreas Korbmacher. The responsible state authorities had it in hand, one "Patchwork" to prevent.

DUH managing director Resch is "happy and content"

12:20 p.m.: When "Big day for clean air in Germany" Jurgen Resch from German Environmental Aid denotes the judgment. This year there are driving bans for diesel with the Euro standard 4. Standards 5 and 6 receive a transition period, he said after the announcement.

Judgment

12:14 p.m.: The air pollution control plans must be implemented as quickly as possible, according to the judges. However, the proportionality must be maintained. There is no financial compensation for affected drivers. A collapse of the used car market is not to be feared. Certain losses of value should be accepted. Only a few places are affected by possible driving bans.Signs for possible driving bans can be made. Checks by police officers are also possible. The difficulty of the controls is not an argument against driving bans.

Driving bans come – walk to the ECJ not necessary

12:10 p.m.: The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig made its way for diesel driving bans in cities on Tuesday. The municipalities may impose them independently, the judges judged. A nationwide regulation is not necessary for this. A walk to the ECJ is not necessary.

It starts

12:04 p.m.: The judges are in the place. There should be a judgment at any moment.

Let the diesel convert? That is thrown out money

11:55 a.m.: For years, car manufacturers were able to build dirty diesel engines. Now they should be converted. You don’t reveal drivers what that really means. Site reporter Sebastian Viehmann has a clear opinion on this.

Let the diesel convert? That is thrown out money

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-higher

Site Let the diesel convert? That is thrown out money

Both sides are in the hall

11:46 am: Almost a quarter of an hour before the start, both sides are in the courtroom.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-judgment
Fol Resch and his lawyer

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-higher
Fol The lawyers of the countries

Auto- against environmental lobby

11:33 am: It shows who wins. Just under 30 minutes until the judgment is to be announced.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-demands
Fol Greenpeace activists before the Federal Administrative Court

Auto industry: Personal air can also be reached without driving bans

11:17 am: Before the Federal Administrative Court’s judgment on possible driving bans, the auto industry again advertised for free travel in cities on Tuesday. "The ambitious guidelines for air quality in German cities can also be achieved without driving bans", Matthias Wissmann, the President of the Association of the Automotive Industry, said on Tuesday at an industry congress. The question of air quality will detach itself in the medium term if more vehicles come into the fleet with new exhaust gas standards.The court in Leipzig wanted to announce its decision at noon whether driving bans for diesel cars in cities are legally permitted. In many cities, limit values for nitrogen oxides have not been met in many cities that are considered harmful to health.Wissmann said the auto industry significantly participated in reducing nitrogen oxide emissions. They also reduce carbon dioxide emissions, also by modern diesel cars. The industry president was confident that 15 to 25 percent of the new cars will have an electric motor in seven years.

Duh managing director Resch defies the cold

11:10 am: But this man lasts until the end: Germany’s top diesel plaintiff Resch today hopes for a judgment of the Federal Administrative Court that makes driving bans for cars in German cities possible.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-demands
Fol DUH managing director Jurgen Resch

Again bright sunshine in Leipzig.

11:08 p.m.: But this time the cold wave was largely washed away before the Federal Administrative Court.

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-higher
Fol The Federal Administrative Court before the diesel judgment on 27. February

Transport Minister Hermann: Driving bans alone are not a solution

10:26 a.m.: In the fight against pollutants in cities, diesel driving bans are not a permanent solution, according to Baden-Wurttemberg’s transport minister Winfried Hermann (Greens). "We have to organize a traffic transition in the cities", he said in SWR2 on Tuesday. People would have to change, public transport had to be better and the bike and foot traffic should also be promoted. "Not having diesel drivers drive on certain days alone is not the real help."In order to get better air, not only politics, but also everyone must act – especially the auto industry. "She finally has to make retrofitting and not just talking about it."The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig decides on Tuesday whether driving bans for diesel cars in cities are legally permitted. The judgment could have nationwide signal effect. The focus is on whether cities can order prohibitions according to applicable law – or whether there must be new, nationwide rules in order to comply with pollutant limit values.

City of Munich does not want a diesel driving ban for individual streets

08.32 a.m.: Dermunchner city administration is divided in front of the diesel judgment, which could now fall in Leipzig at the Federal Administrative Court. Specifically, the Munich -based company ensures that the Munich. That reports the "Bavarian Radio".So-called "Route -related driving bans" would not apply to the whole city center, but only in certain streets. And that would be expensive. According to a current study, air is dirty than allowed in 24 percent of all Munich streets. 124 kilometers of city paths are affected.In order to lock diesel cars everywhere, 130 would.000 street signs and two years took the Munich environmental officer Stephanie Jacobs calculated, according to the "BR" – Only so that the diesel may then dodge through residential areas and pollute the air there.

Sometimes only a few hundred meters: so few streets would be affected by the driving ban

Sometimes only a few hundred meters: so few streets would be affected by the driving ban

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-judgment

Site/Wochit Sometimes only a few hundred meters: so few streets would be affected by the driving ban

DIHK warns "Rashed quick shots"

Tuesday, 27. February 2018, 05.Midnight: Before the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court on diesel driving bans in cities, the DIHK warned of considerable negative consequences of possible driving bans for the local economy. "The DIHK warns of hysteria and rash fast shots", said Achim Dercks, Vice-Managing Director of the DIHK, who appeared in Dusseldorf "Rheinische Post". "Economic traffic in particular would suffer sensitive", said the representative of the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DIHK). Three quarters of the commercially used vehicles would drive with diesel drive. "Driving bans are usually not proportionate means for clean air in cities", said dercks. The German District Council (DLT) also rejected any form of driving bans. "It would be to be expected with a significant impact on commuters and companies that would be completely excluded from inner -city traffic", said DLT President Reinhard Sager.

Who should control that? Police considers diesel driving bans to be not feasible

Who should control that? Police considers diesel driving bans to be not feasible

Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums-higher

Site/Wochit Who should control that? Police considers diesel driving bans to be not feasible

Related articles

Please follow and like us:

10 thoughts on “Diesel judgment in the news ticker: SPD demands higher exchange premiums”

  1. Environmental aid
    All just stupid chatter. They all just want to get their posts.You can do this … No longer hear or.Read. We can’t save the whole world. Finally understand. The whole world is already laughing at us.

    Reply
  2. Every time
    When driving bans are pronounced…. General strike let’s see how those responsible in Berlin and Brussels are stupidly looking out of the laundry politicians are not an absolute ruler … They were chosen for temporary representatives of the people. And not more. It is time to show this euro crowns who the sovereign is

    Reply
  3. Good that there is resch
    No better votes collectors cannot exist for the AfD, keep resusing it, you can make it until 2021, the AfD can put a monument later

    Reply
  4. Nobody needs duh like that
    Everything is said with measurements that are not the EU. Driving bans due to false measured values are simply not noticed by me

    Reply
  5. the environmental aid knows what it does??
    The ladies and gentlemen do not seem to have guessed that CO2 emissions in diesel vehicles are clearly noticeably less than with petrol engines (and as long as the electricity in Germany is mainly made from fossil fuels, electric cars are even worse, because there are two efficiency Up to the fore, it is lost twice, so that much more primary energy sources are used up)! The ladies and gentlemen should take care of the climbing of the sea level, which can be clearly demonstrated!!

    Reply
  6. Only recently is an interesting one
    Article on the machinations of the DUH published by young freedom . I miss a critical report at site. Google!I said it right from the start, the DUH only pursues its business model (warning) under the guise of health and environment!It is strange that the politicians even reject an investigation of the limit values .The result would not only herald the end of the DUH, it would again show the politics of our government again.The 8 gentlemen get 4 million from the DUH from us to the taxpayer! And you know what, as an engineer, I can tell you that the DPF can almost save yourself through the optimization of combustion temperatures! Analogous to the vacuum cleaner, all filters must be changed (produced).

    Reply
  7. Measuring
    the EU according to the picture. Public prosecutors should take a look at the decision -making: Who decided to set up the measurement stations so that the maximum values are recorded. In Stuttgart, the values on the opposite side of the street third !

    Reply
  8. Environmental aid is just an association!
    In this weak state, every club can slowly make politics.If we had a strong chancellor, it would have built up so much public pressure on the automotive groups that they had voluntarily paid the complete conversion.Merkel is a paperiger, abroad you laugh about her behind her hand.Apart from that, the hype with supposedly 6000 deaths is only a fog candle from the party’s dropouts.Smokers live a lot more dangerous and even from them not everyone dies of lung cancer.

    Reply
  9. The fainting of the citizens
    Against professional warners who earn a lot of money with it. One has the feeling that the lawyers’ lobby is well represented in the federal government. It affects all areas of life. Hardly finished, a lawyer today has unlimited opportunities to earn good money at the expense of fellow citizens. If a warning association, like environmental aid, even receives funding, then the suspicion against the herbing caste is even greater. There are still no legal regulations to limit earnings in the event of warnings. Process assistance would also have to be changed so that a lawyer would have to pay for unnecessary lawsuits. That would prevent many complaints.

    Reply
  10. One wonders you
    Where do we live when an interest -controlled association has the opportunity to cause damage to citizens and look at the state and judiciary? As a state, I have to have the power to turn off my citizens, no matter what form. If you set the limit values up and good, if you don’t like it, you can pull somewhere else. But a state of rejected asylum seekers enables to complain about state costs, is huddled and doomed to doom.

    Reply

Leave a Comment