Green parliamentary group leader Anton Hofreiter is of the opinion that the federal government is still on the brakes on e-mobility: “The expansion of the charging infrastructure must be significantly accelerated if the federal government is serious about the goal it has set itself of one million charging points in 2030”. His statement was based on the charging infrastructure in the field of e-cars. But there is also a need for action with electric or fuel cell trucks, as a study is able to show.
According to an analysis, the construction of a Europe-wide network of charging points for electric trucks or hydrogen filling stations for heavy goods vehicles would cost billions. However, if you compare these costs to a possible climate effect, they are “manageable”. This is the result of a recent study by the consulting firm PwC Strategy&. The study assumes that around 120 fast-charging parks on important long-distance routes with an estimated cost of 2.5 billion euros would be necessary to get long-distance transport with alternative drives up and running.
If trucks powered by fuel cells become established, from the current perspective one would have to calculate around 2.2 billion euros to set up the necessary infrastructure – including 70 separate hydrogen filling stations. One such example could be the Mercedes-Benz GenH2 truck. Presented as a concept vehicle from 2023, the GenH2 truck will demonstrate in customer trials that the fuel cell is ideal for long-distance haulage and commercial vehicle traffic. up to 1.000 km range should be possible with one tank filling. After successfully completing customer trials, the GenH2 truck is scheduled to go into series production in the second half of the decade. But Hyundai, HYZON Motors and even Freudenberg Sealing Technologies also rely on the fuel cell for the “titans of the highway”.
Currently, the discussion comes up again and again, whether electric trucks or fuel cell trucks. The fuel cell in particular is given opportunities here, as it has a greater range. However, these drives are comparatively expensive – and first of all, elementary hydrogen must be produced in large quantities and, if possible, with renewable electricity. Trucks that rely on synthetically produced fuels as energy carriers were also considered as part of the study. But draw the short straw in terms of costs. Because in ten years these would be around 95 cents per kilometer. In contrast, 68 cents are accepted for electric trucks and 65 cents for hydrogen trucks. The normal diesel combustion engine would be significantly cheaper at 57 cents.
Hydrogen Europe: Fuel cell trucks almost no longer stop
May sound a little bead, but what the Hydrogen Europe, has agreed in the context of the European Hydrogen Week, indeed indicate that fuel cell trucks are…
Almost 2000 kilometers range and plans for Europe: Nikola Motors shows new fuel cell trucks
Two fuel cell trucks, a rough and a jet skiing vehicle: the US Startup Nikola Motors has once again attention to four innovative vehicle concepts. Nikola…
Daimler Trucks: Worldwide initiative for electric truck loading infrastructure
Daimler Trucks is a pioneer of electromobility: on the one hand with e-truck in worldwide customer use, on the other hand with a holistic ecosystem…
Daimler launches intense tests with fuel cell trucks
Daimler Trucks relies on the hydrogen-based fuel cell when electrifying its trucks for flexible and demanding long-distance traffic areas. The goal is…
140 gas stations should be able to supply fuel cell trucks
Truck with hydrogen drive are prominently represented in the national hydrogen strategy and are a way to decorate freight traffic on the road. A crucial…
1.500 fuel cell trucks from HYZON on the road in New Zealand by 2026
Hyzon Motors will be 1st by 2026.Bring 500 zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty trucks to New Zealand. In parallel, the New Zealand company…
Hyundai launches hydrogen ecosystem for fuel cell trucks
The Korean automaker Hyundai continues to drive the mobility of the future. In the next year, Hyundai returns the first trucks with environmentally…
AFC Energy: premiere of the electric car charger based on fuel cell technology
With Ch3ARGE, the British company AFC Energy has presented the world’s first well-known electric vehicle charger based on hydrogen fuel cell technology….
The H2Haul project puts fuel cell trucks on the road
Leading European truck manufacturers, fuel cell suppliers and hydrogen refueling infrastructure providers have announced a collaboration to develop and…
Hyzon Motors brings fuel cell trucks to New Zealand on the street
Hyzon wants to bring vehicles for mass use on the road – trucks and buses – to support the downstream use of hydrogen production on a large scale. The…
4 thoughts on “Electric or fuel cell trucks are more likely to fail because of the infrastructure than the drive”
What kind of nonsense is being spread again..
There is currently no hydrogen truck that can cover more than 500 km ..
In addition, the cost calculation makes no sense, electric vehicles are already more efficient than diesel, so why should a truck be higher in terms of costs… Yes, vehicles can be more expensive to buy, but due to the high mileage and the hopefully low repair costs, an electric truck is now already cheaper..
With the kilometer costs of the hydrogen truck, I can’t say what was calculated here, the hydrogen is relatively more expensive than the KW for the electric truck, the double costs come with the truck..
Here it seems almost only like Nikola when it comes to hydrogen..
It’s nice that you link to the Mercedes BZ truck. But the truck is an example of how it is not that easy with the H2 filling stations: should there be 70 H2 filling stations with high-pressure hydrogen at 700 bar? Or (as the Mercedes needs it) liquid hydrogen at -253°C? You can quickly sink a few billion if another technology prevails. The same applies to a limited extent to e-trucks, according to the current CCS standard with up to 350 kW it won’t do anything to sufficiently charge an e-truck with a large battery in 45 minutes (legal driving break) (if you take realistic charging capacities as a basis). Do you need pantograph fast chargers like with e-buses?? Or a new wired standard? That should be clear before billions are pumped into infrastructure..
As long as there are not really real hydrogen trucks that can actually travel long distances, it is total nonsense to set up hydrogen filling stations and then at some point to realize that there are no functional and economically functioning hydrogen trucks.
And in addition, according to occupational safety and health, truck drivers are only allowed to drive 4.5 hours at a time and then have to drive 45 minutes. Taking a break that would be max. 80km/h on the Autobahn. 360km in a row, so a battery-electric truck would have to cover these kilometers in 45 minutes. can recharge so why then hydrogen trucks with a range of 1000km?
Hopefully Tesla will end the moronic discussions at 10:30 p.m. today. For delivery traffic with a central depot, Tesla will probably only order semis with MW chargers and soon autobidder-controlled power supply in the next few years. I wish our politicians continued stimulating dreams.