The change to e-mobility is bought expensive and runs socially unfair. To this result, a study by Deutsche Bank, as we could report in the middle of the week. heise online asked the Federal Ministry of Economics for an opinion. These led as one of the motives of e-auto funding that you want to receive international market leadership of the German automotive industry.
Furthermore, the electromobility for a sustainable growth of the business location Germany is enormous. In addition, e-mobility is also the key to climate-friendly mobility. Reason enough to promote E cars accordingly. Whereby the Federal Ministry of Economics continues to perform that many people and families were affected by job losses during a degradation of the German automotive industry. In addition, a decreasing competitiveness would also be associated with high overall economic losses and costs for the company, for example by falling tax revenues.
Is it according to the study of Deutsche Bank it costs the German state more than 20.000 Euro if an electric car is used in the upscale middle class instead of a car with internal combustion engine. Reason, in addition to the pure purchase bonus, further fiscal effects. In addition, better earners would benefit significantly more, it means. Overall, Deutsche Bank concludes that the contribution to climate protection is still small in Germany and will be bought expensive with electromobility. In addition, Deutsche Bank sees social attention with regard to the fiscal effects. Better earners currently benefited most of the subsidies, while low-income (with own car) relative to their income paid a fairly high part of the subsidies.
On the part, the Ministry of Economic Affairs stresses that the Federal Government is in principle pursuing a technology-open approach to the climate-friendly transformation of the transport sector, so that the purchase bonus called by its environmental bonus is also designed. The government support the startup of electromobility, but the steering lever used but would be continuously adapted and optimized, it is called in the opinion for heise online. Furthermore, it is made that you make e-mobility accessible to all population layers.
This also show that vehicles with a list price of less than 40.000 euros on the environmental bonus and the innovation premium are more promoted than those who ran a more expensive car. In addition, today’s purchase incentives had a positive effect on a later used car market for electric vehicles; Of these, socially weaker population groups would benefit in particular.
Related articles
-
Federal Government: No promotion for E-Fuels
This year, the electric car could experience its breakthrough. But not only this is the focus of the consideration of alternative drives. Fuel cell…
-
The Federal Government Officially Extends The Environmental Bonus Until The End of 2020
A Good Two Weeks Ago There’s quiet Talk of the Fact That Pure Electric Cars Would Soon Have 6.000 Euros Environmental Bonus, AS Well AS for PHEV 4.500…
-
Federal Government Renounts Pioneering Role and Continues to Rely on Fossil Vehicle Fleet
From 2030, The Greens Are Calling for People to Be On The Road Without A Car With A Fossil-Fuelled Combustion Engine… – This post Just Came Across The…
-
Environmental bonus and nothing else? Federal government slows down e-car funding programs
Information that will surprise and offend many at the same time: The application for the environmental bonus of up to 9,000 euros may only be made if the…
-
Deutsche Bank: e-mobility from the state expensive bought
The change to e-mobility is bought expensive and runs socially unfair. To this result comes a study by Deutsche Bank, from the “Heise.de “quoted….
-
Federal Government clearly misses its own electric car targets
Actually, the Federal Government wanted to take a role model function in electromobility and introduce thousands of electric cars to their own fleets…
-
Federal Government has launched new environmental bonus
Currently buyers of an electric car receive a subsidy for the purchase price, called environmental bonus, in the amount of 4.000 EURO. Soon there will be…
-
Federal Cabinet decides stronger and longer promotion for e-cars
We remember, early November the car summit met in Berlin. Then it was determined that the purchase bonus for electric cars is increased as well as the…
-
Federal Government Plans More Funding for E-Buses
June 2015, The Federal Ministry of Transport’s Subsidy Guideline for Electromobility Came Into Force. Since Then, Investment Grants for The Procurement…
-
Federal Government Plans to Subsidize Battery Cell Production with Up to Two Billion Euros
Federal Minister of Economics Peter Altmaier (CDU) Visited Warsaw This Week, Where He brought up the topic of a joint german-polish battery alliance….
Has already noticed anyone that the environmental premium at 40-45.000 € quasi of the 19% VAT. correspond? So you could say the electric car is sold quasi without taxes ..
For every bafa payment is also a real purchased and used car against it. Quite different as a flat sum to z.B. Any consultant, where practical benefits can be brought happily.
The climate change caused by consumer behavior and population explosion with steadily decreasing fossil raw materials will come to us expensive enough.
A Deutsche Bank supports only environmental destruction by these factors.
We need more environmental activism that practices progress in harmony with nature and the environment, and certainly no banks that sees the future in exhaust gases emitting burners.
The state report of Deutsche Bank on this topic is realistic but implausible, since he
from corrupt bankers who have been anything but environmentally friendly so far. Surprisingly, the Minister of the Environment has dared to cover the end of the black-red coalition from the end of the black-red coalition and explains the economic minister for incompetent, which is certainly true. In the opinion first of the preservation of market leadership, instead of climate protection, says everything. Also the definition of degradation of the German automotive industry is wrong, it’s about conversion. It is logical and well known in technology change usually less staff is logical and well known. A well-functioning Ministry of Economic Affairs must create meaningful and well-feasible framework conditions. In this case, only clientelic policy has been recognizable. Continue to talk about the technology-open approach is more than bully, as hydrogen and synthetic fuels are more than inefficient in the automotive sector. We should take the name to Norwegian environmental policy. This is difficult in Germany, as lobbyism is too strong for damage to us all.
I read the report itself. I find the title stupid and on image-saving level. But the content is so far correct and not against BEV and the numbers were not chosen “suitable”, rather for BEV. It’s the way it was presented in the report, the mouse does not like a thread,
Denoch is the conclusion for me another. Especially in Germany you have to throw the bacon after the conversion to BEV with the bacon. This is also due to the remaining combustion lobby and their massive FUD distribution and the rather technical attendance of the Germans.
Without these massive misinformation, consumers would already grab at much small promotion to BEV.
I think the policy has to focate the inner-city charging options, keyword “Lanternenparker” much more solids and the money invested there is more likely to inspire the BEV sales than the current subsidies that are actually misguided sometimes. At the moment, the BEV share of homeowners is growing strong enough, so this is not a sales problem yet, but in a few years we fall on the feet and that would be socially unfair, since then the combustion costs are already very high and people without their own parking significant Disadvantages with BEVs must accept. If today, yesterday already, in the city a road is torn, the power cables for loading would have to be included and each parking space must have a mine number at charging points that is not too low and must be expandable.
Recently I was in Dresden. In the city center there is no one-to-use public charging option, unbelievable! Once people can see that you can load everywhere and it also works technically, the change also runs with significantly less subsidies.
Especially the Deutsche Bank plays with the words “social” and “unfair”.
This bank, the
Of course, she keeps a lot of the money of organizations that exploit this planet, make uninhabitable and equip people with weapons ..
Just sarcastic.
Who suspects here truth?
Quote: “Where the Federal Ministry of Economics continues to perform that many people and families were affected by job losses with a reduction of the German automotive industry.”
Thus, the economic Council of the former government once again proved how dependent here is a reasoning that has very clear causes.
1) The fraud burning industry does not want to separate from the burner, as it hereby the biggest gains:
But they are to be paid:
2) The fraud combustion industry continues to hold on to the path:
One only looks at the concentration of the automotive industry, for example, in Saxony. A great tax and social cost savings model is that. Over 200 companies have settled here, not because of social intentions.
Rather because of the unocycle operating models: only 30% of normal disease and pension contributions! (Tesla will also be able to implement this model, I find only fair, same conditions for all).
This all does:
3) Fact is,
Our children and grandchildren will only be used for low-value services in the future.
Because there will be a uninhabitable planet back.
And we managed that, the economically allegedly most widespread country on this planet, which only buys “made in Asia”, which is for power and wealth with its consumption and the unrestrained greed, which we are dependent on a healthy planet.