Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 – better than Tesla? Audi’s new E-SUV in the test

Driving report Audi Q4 e-tron

More chic than a VW ID4 – but better than Tesla? Audi’s new electric SUV in the test

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-tron
Audi Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback

  • Site author Wolfgang Gomoll

With the Audi Q4 E-Tron 50 Sportback Quattro, the Ingolstadt car manufacturer is leading the power attack of the VW Group. The top model left a good impression on a first test drive.

The secrets of the modular e-drive construction kit (MEB), on which a whole fleet of electromobiles of the VW group is based, are almost all ventilated. One thing remains: what can the preliminary top version with 220 kW / 299 hp, a torque of 460 Newton meters and all-wheel drive? Finally the VW ID come.4 as GTX and the Skoda IV RS as power variants of the respective model series. However, the spearhead of this power offensive is reserved for Audi, which with the Q4 e-tron 50 Quattro will show what is in the group technology from June.

Audi Q4: 300 hp with electric all-wheel wheel

In view of these performance data, fans of the US electric SUVs called Ford Mach-E or Tesla Model Y. But the first test drive with the Ingolstadt e-crossover shows that one is one of the alpha animals on German country roads and highways with a sprint time of 6.2 seconds. Although the Volvo mode, i.e. the limitation of the top speed at 180 km/h, the power idea somewhat contractor. After all, the Jaguar I-Pace EV400 S AWD is faster by 20 km/h. But then probably the group boundaries and possibly the limits of the MEB to the Audi engineers the soup.

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-tron
Audi Audi Q4 e-tron

Finally, the Jaguar comes with a 90 kilowatt hour battery, while the Audi energy stores bring it to 82 kWh (76.6 kWh net). This is supposed to go far from the Audi Q4 E-Tron 50 Quattro up to 497 kilometers (WLTP). During our test drive we would have had to look for a charging station after 347.7 kilometers and the average consumption including motorway stages with a short -term top speed settled at 21.7 kWh/100 km, that is only 0.8 kWh/100 km more than Audi indicates.

At 180 the stallion is neutered: is the electro-mustang muscle car or muesli car?

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-tron

Site At 180 the stallion is neutered: is the electro-mustang muscle car or muesli car?

Limited charging power to 125 kW

The fact that the maximum direct current charging capacity is only 125 kW does not match the high-tech claim of the Audi. There should be an update in the course of the year. Others can already do more. According to Audi, the battery should be filled from 5 to 80 percent in 38 minutes at the fastest loading pace in 38 minutes. If you hang the Q4 e-tron 50 Sportback Quattro on a 11 kW wall box, 7.5 hours to fill the empty batteries completely.

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-better
Audi Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron 50 Quattro is fired by two electric motors: At the back it is a permanent-rainy synchronous machine (PSM) with 150 kW / 204 hp) and 310 Newton meters of torque and an asynchronous machine (ASM) at the front (109 hp ) and 162 Newton meters. The advantage of this "mixing construction" is that the ASM can run along without towing losses and participates in the propulsion at lightning speed. The electrical version of a slope-on all-wheel drive, so to speak,.

Weight of 2.1 tons is a disadvantage

This drive architecture proves in conjunction with the mixed tires (255 in the rear and 235 in front) as a joy donor and when it comes to driving fun, the Audi mixes in its segment at the top. For the 4.59 meter long Audi with a turning circle of only 10.2 meters, curves are a natural environment. Only when it comes with a lot of Karacho about narrow corners, the weight of 2140 kilograms is noticeable and the Q4 e-tron gently pushes outwards. The precisely acting progressive steering contributes to this agility, but is not as communicative as we wish.

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-better
Audi Audi Q4 e-tron

The chassis with the adaptive dampers, on the other hand, can easily cope with the mass of the E-SUV and is not exaggerated even in the dynamic driving program. Interestingly, level two out of three recuperation strengths is activated in this mode. "We think that a sporty driver likes to act with his rockers on the steering wheel," explains the technical project manager Michael Kaufmann. However, it is not switched here, but the strength of energy recovery is changed. If you want to save yourself, simply use the automatic B function, which is synonymous with level three. Otherwise, the well -known driving modes Comfort and car offer the usual function. The Efficiency program is interesting, in which the top speed is limited to 130 km/h (can be overruled by accelerator pedal)). In this driving program, the interaction between navigation, the sensors and the drive train designed for the greatest possible efficiency and that means sailing instead of recuperation for the Audi engineers. If the system recognizes the beginning of a city, for example, the brake interventions are not quite as brutal, but more subtle and longer.

Tesla driver lists his costs: after 120.000 kilometers is clear his conclusion

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-tesla

Site Tesla driver lists his costs: after 120.000 kilometers is clear his conclusion

XXL screens and virtual instruments

The interaction of the systems works like a single source and is one of the great strength of the Audi Q4 e-tron. The infotainment processor is the same as it is used in the large SUV brother Audi E-Tron. The operation also runs in the Q4 e-tron accordingly smoothly. The head-up display projects a 70 inch monitor in the virtual size, but the contrast is too low when the flying navigation arrow is too low. "This is a problem, we are working on it," admits Kaufmann. In the interior, the Audi driver can quickly find your way around with the virtual instruments with the 10.1-inch touchscreen (later 11.6 inches) and the 10.25 inch cockpit. The interior of the Q4 e-tron is similar to that of the models with combustion engine. This should make it easier for drivers to switch to electromobility. The materials also feel after Audi and the flap of the glove compartment more valuable than the Skoda Enyaq. Everyone has to decide whether this justifies the surcharge of a few thousand euros.

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-schicker
Audi Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi E-SUV is completely electromobile again. Even in the rear, despite the coupe roof around the head, there is no close. The trunk is also large enough for sportsback with 535 liters, if you put on the back seat backrest, a flat loading area is created and the volume grows to 1460 liters. Remains the price of the Audi Q4 e-tron 50 Quattro. If you want to get this top model, you place at least 54.500 euros on the table. However, you should consider whether you have the chic 21 inch tires mounted, because the producing significant louder rolling noises than the 20 inch pneus. If you can do without all-wheel drive and horsepower, you should take a closer look. It costs as Sportback 49.500 euros and with 534 kilometers is the range of the range of the series.Surf tip: Tesla-Undersinn in Texas: Elon Musk lets cars run to sell them back to Texans

New Skoda in the test: The end of the philistine is there

Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 - better than Tesla? Audi's new E-SUV in the test-better

Site New Skoda in the test: The end of the philistine is there

Everything about electromobility

On our e-mobility portal site you will find all e-vehicles & hybrids available on the German market with technical data, prices, delivery times and model comparisons. There are ongoing insider news, tests of all important vehicles, an overview of charging stations and a range computer.

You can also arrange a test drive for your desired car for free and start e-mobility easily.

Related articles

Please follow and like us:

13 thoughts on “Q4 e -tron: Schicker than VW ID4 – better than Tesla? Audi’s new E-SUV in the test”

  1. All around, the
    The one, which is really important, is the big face (formerly: snout) of this box, … She also expresses the whole, pathetic package that should be obtained (;-) (but not wants) for a lot of money)… Fiiieell Schass with the cucumber!

    Reply
  2. That is …
    -More chic than a VW ID4 … Not really difficult. VW seems to have taken the old Honda CRV as a model for the ID4! The 20 year old, I mean!

    Reply
  3. Limited charging power…
    A optically for my taste successful car. The performance -related key data follows of physics. In this respect no real surprise. The limited charging power of 125 kW is not a problem here in the area of my place of residence / place of work. There are a few 50 kW charging stations in the wider area. 😉 Usage profiles of electric vehicles will have to be based on the availability of loading points and available charging power in the future. If you are in the fortunate location to have a private charging point with 11 kW / 22 kW available, you may even be able to recharge your batteries cheaper. Not all e-vehicle users will be allowed to use this privilege unfairly. The bottle neck is not the electric vehicle, but the charging infrastructure.

    Reply
  4. Driving with a follower ?
    What I lack in almost all “auto tests” in this vehicle category is the information related to trailer load and consumption with trailers ! If I would like to draw a caravan or another follower for leisure or work, this would be helpful for decision -making. Otherwise you stay better with the proven diesel, "man" knows what he has and what he consumes. I don’t have to drive a charging station that works, search and can drive relaxed to the planned goal, without an additional overnight stay and stress. The previous experience reports from Eautobeesitzers in relation to vacation trips are hair -raising !

    Reply
  5. Absurd
    The Q4 has an indicated radiator grille like a wall unit.He fights against the wind.At Tesla you would shake your head about something like that. But so what – that’s a stop with us "Premium"

    Reply
  6. Lord wisdom,
    Her name says it, while Autoland Germany drives on the wall, you will of course continue to talk about Premium!

    Reply
  7. A great car –
    According to conventional combustion standards. What is really important for an electric car is efficiency. Because it determines how "environmentally" The vehicle is actually in operation. Here the Audi (CW value 0.28) is still far behind Tesla (Model Y: CW value 0.23), which means that the power consumption is correspondingly high, even if you tried to present it differently in the article. If Audi has parked this shortcoming (and adjusted the charging to Tesla’s Supercharger system) it is the first choice for me. Unfortunately not before.

    Reply
  8. Comparison with data
    The strin surface of the Q4 is given as 2.65 sqm. The Strin surface of the Model Y calculates from height width is 3.11 sqm. These values multiplied by the CW value and an assumed speed of 80 km/h gives a flow resistance of 59.36 for the Model Y = 57.40. Despite the larger front surface of the Model Y, thanks to the better CW, it has a lower flow resistance.

    Reply
  9. to argue about it…
    and become personal…no no no ….The car is neither beautiful, nor does it fit the size and performance into the times (except for the ever triggered premium drivers)….But we will all really understand that in 10 to 20 years when the car is then others "Status symbols" is replaced 🙂

    Reply
  10. Mr. Harper,
    You should read and understand my wording before you scold me again as Teslahader. I wrote that it proves a certain mental poorness if you buy a Tesla because of the acceleration. What is simple. I didn’t say that all Tesla customers do this like this. That is a fine difference. Read exactly, Mr. Harper. How do you come to decide what I can afford? You do not know me. Such claims are only provocations that you consciously set. But it doesn’t matter what you think what I can afford. My comments are probably published because they are not as hateful as they are happy to assume. Live by that there are people who do not like Tesla, even if it doesn’t suit them

    Reply
  11. Better or not ?
    Do not understand the discussions and the permanent comparisons. Nobody chooses a car, only because of 1 sec. Faster at the traffic lights. In the event of a morm, completely different parameters such as z. E.g. Optics, feel, price….. In the case of the battery mobile, there is also: where can I load the box in everyday life ? I can do that at home – everything is good and can continue to compare. If I can’t, the topic of battery car is usually already done. That is my opinion, everyone can buy what they like anyway.

    Reply
  12. This Audi Q4 e-tron,
    is of the performance of accelerating is completely ok. You don’t really need more. There are also women who are traveling with their children, so you don’t need this brute acceleration. So what is the term "Power attack", Because he’s too heavy. Fully loaded, this is massively on the range. Added to this is the sailing instead of recuperation, this is not installed in hybrids in e-cars. But the buyer should decide for himself what is more important to him.

    Reply
  13. Mr. FrOhlich,
    Whoever can read and interpret is clearly an advantage!! And what does the Audi report have to do with Tesla? I don’t believe it, how do the Germans tick?

    Reply

Leave a Comment