VDA demands better political requirements for transformation

VDA demands better political requirements for transformation-political

The Bundestag has adopted the new Climate Protection Act a few days ago, thus adopting higher CO2 reduction targets for 2030 and a drifthouse gas neutrality for Germany for 2045. This explains the President of the Association of the German Automotive Industry (VDA), Hildegard Muller, that Germany must now show how these “extremely ambitious goals can be implemented”.

The industry is under great change pressure because the business models and jobs must be transformed into the new time. According to Muller, Germany goes a step further than others and thus succeeds in the model case, such as the transformation “. Consumers and the rest of the world could only be convinced of more climate protection if the objectives adopted economically successfully and socially acceded. “Only when climate protection is a job, growth and prosperity engine, it is implemented globally,” says VDA President.

“This Climate Protection Act will affect all areas of the economy and society – even on employees and consumers,” says Muller. It finds that the social consequences “unfortunately unfortunately neither sufficiently analyzed nor appropriate measures integrated to compensate”. “We have to design the transformation so that we do not lose the support from the people”. With increasing unemployment in Germany or Europe, however, can not be expected with support for the change. “We therefore need industrial policy programs that enables the transformation process in the companies,” demands the highest lobbyist of the automotive industry.

“In order for the new goals to be achieved, the Federal Government and the EU Commission must meet many prerequisites. We need a faster expansion of renewable energies and a nationwide expansion of charging infrastructure in Germany and all over Europe, as well as a faster deployment of hydrogen and e-fuels. And finally a faster digitization and the expansion of 5g networks.”- Hildegard Muller, President VDA

The auto industry understands Muller as a “driver of change”. The industry invests only by 2025 a record amount of 150 billion euros in new drives, battery technology and digitization. “These investments need to be able to be earned again,” gives the VDA president to consider, which, however, “a significant improvement of the location conditions” is absolutely necessary. The flavor list is long: in Germany Rule “a dangerous combination of highest labor costs worldwide in the automotive industry, highest energy costs, highest tax burden for businesses and workers, slow bureaucratic processes, poor Internet”. In order to be able to comply with the new promises of climate protection, “concrete measures in all these areas” must be made.

In this context, Muller also refers to the “great responsibility” of the policy, which contributed to the decision for better climate protection. “It does not help the world climate if industrial production in regions where much more carbon dioxide is ejected for the same result must be migrated to the same result.”The climate protection goals can therefore only be achieved” with a strong industry, technology-open system and courageous location reforms “.

Related articles

Please follow and like us:

8 thoughts on “VDA demands better political requirements for transformation”

  1. Germany does not have anything. The climate scientists have found that humanity is above all the one with their western lifestyle the own grave. The automotive industry is one of the largest influencing factors thereof. It is 5 before 12. If climate protection fails, no matter if it is job and prosperity engine, there will be war, hunger and death. The earth once gets “fever” extended the troublemry person largely and then the game starts again from the beginning. I do not like the scenario.

    Farnsworth

    Reply
  2. The VDA President is only ridiculous she wants the children to die because of the C o2 . She is no longer saving . The auto industry has already recognized that it only succeeds about electro cars to achieve the CO2 goals .

    Reply
  3. The automotive corporations make billions gains and then still want subsidies from the state for the
    Transformation of their production, three things are not. That could demand every business. Talking to Technology Instity and thus want to promote inefficient technologies is more than bunched. That by transformation the winnings out of small ones, they do not want to accept.

    Reply
  4. Maybe Ms. Muller should animate the members of their association once to invest less money in advertising contracts and simply use these funds to build charging infrastructure – Zack, problem solved &# 128521;

    Reply
  5. This explains the President of the Association of the German Automotive Industry (VDA), Hildegard Muller, that Germany must now show how these “extremely ambitious goals can be implemented”.

    Why does Germany have to show that?

    It is the “pollution industry” that has earned a lot of money with “dirt into the air bubbles”, which now has to show that movement in the interest of future generations also goes cleaner.

    We need a faster expansion of renewable energies and a nationwide expansion of charging infrastructure in Germany and all over Europe, as well as a faster deployment of hydrogen and e-fuels. And finally a faster digitization and the expansion of 5g networks.”- Hildegard Muller, President VDA

    We do not need a hydrogen and no e-foes – that only needs the industry, especially the large corporations – we should only pay the subsidies for the corporations to be cheaper.

    In the case of electricity, we are already paying the EEG surcharge to finance the ERNERGENDENDER and the big corporations will get the cheap electricity because they left the EEG surcharge.

    Why does the industry do not show that it is for environmental protection?

    The auto industry can be paid by the taxpayers their electric car and then predominantly even large and heavy plugin hybrids, the more dirt and particulate matter (also by elevated tire abrasion) into the air bubbles than normal burners – so to speak subsidized dirt charters.

    And what? – For profit maximization and CO2-SchOnfarberei – so Mrs. Muller, sometimes remind their association members at climate change and their merchants that e-cars also noise without subsidies would no longer sell when all the car companies have to sell clean cars according to the same laws.

    Reply
  6. Every few days you read “VDA calls for this or that …”
    Would like to read, “make / develop the members of the VDA …”!

    But no, constantly doing this toddler behavior, “but I want to … and you should take care of you that we get that – rabhah, rabhah!”

    These are corporations with revenues in billions, or? How about investing in the future, building up your own quick-release network, construction of research and production at batteries, etc. Even a bit of a bit – can only be a startup from California? But no, the little child wants subsidies or similar state subsidies, everything else is exhausting and then you can distribute less dividend.

    The VDA has just become unbearable.

    Reply
  7. Well, the taxpayer should once again pay for what the overpaid beneficant managers was lost or prevented? And what does he get for it?? Anxia rather than implementing within the framework conditions and continue to think profits private, risks and loss to the state?
    Where are exploited profits and investment capital? This is gladly due to the term “coverage of entrepreneurial risk.
    Then the risk is finally the risk.
    The risk of carrying the employees u50 which are simply fired and the employees who need more and more.

    Reply

Leave a Comment